A map on the rise and growth of Christianity. Starting from Palestine, the new faith was at first spread in parts of Asia Minor’s interior, in Corinth and Thessalonike (Greece) and in Naples and Rome (Italy).
Rise and Growth of Christianity: a map
21/06/2021
Uncategorized Anatolia, Asia Minor, Carthage, Christian, Christianity, christians, Europe, Greece, Italy, religion, Roman, Roman Empire, Romans, Syria Leave a comment
NERO: THE HISTORICAL DISTORTION OF A REMARKABLE MAN
30/01/2013
Uncategorized Agrippina, Antium, Cassius Dio, Christian, Galba, Nero, Roman, Roman Emperor, Rome, Suetonius 2 Comments
Imperial Rome.
The Roman emperor Nero is one of the most debatable personalities and his life is well known. Therefore, here I will deal only with some notorious ‘myths’ about his life, and I shall try to briefly quote a more objective picture of the real Nero.
Nero has been accused of numerous crimes and extremely brutal actions. He was indeed a criminal personality, but not to the extent he was assigned to be and certainly not more than other Roman emperors who have been assigned a ‘positive’ historical image (i.e. Constantine the Great). Most importantly, Nero grew up in a environment based on criminality, because of his ruthless mother, Agrippina. This influence accounted for the many murders committed by Nero even after Agrippina’s death, in order to consolidate his rule, because he learned this lesson repeatedly from his mother during her whole life. Agrippina saw her son only as a tool to control the empire. This is the reason why Nero eventually killed her, having no other choice. It is considered most likely that Agrippina who had seduce many men to gain power, had also seduced her own son.
Most scholars consider now almost certain that Nero did not set fire to Rome. This strange rumor was quoted mainly by the ancient historian Cassius Dio (and also by the not really reliable Suetonius and possibly by Pliny) who lived a century after Nero and reproduced the “gossips” during Nero’s reign. Indeed Cassius Dio “places” arbitrarily Nero in the Palatine hill, watching Rome burned and playing his lyre inspired by the fire. Of course, this is not a real incident because Nero could not even approach the Palatine, because the fire had closed the road to the hill. When the fire broke out, Nero was in the city of Antium, in the south of Rome. He returned hastily and did everything he could to save as many citizens as possible, and relieve those affected by the fire. Throughout his life, he was rather characterized by the tendency to help the people, especially the lower social strata, and he used to murder only those who were really threatening him, including his own mother. He detested violence, despite being forced to use it to survive. But the hostile sentiment that it had been created against him in the Roman Senate and nobility (because of his permanent friendly attitude towards the lower social strata, and because of his controversy with the Senators and the aristocrats) turned from the beginning the suspicions about the arson to him. This happened not because the charges against Nero were really logic, but as a pretext to be discredited by his enemies, the senators and the aristocrats (I think that they diffused the rumors that Nero was the arsonist of Rome). And suspicions were intensified when Nero taking advantage of the public space that was “cleaned” by the fire, built there a magnificent palace covering an entire city block. It seems that Nero simply exploited the disaster by the fire, in order to construct the palace that he was planning to build in the suburbs of Rome.